Land and Livelihood

The Apache and the Environment: A Symbiotic Relationship

How Apache peoples lived in and understood their Southwest and Plains homelands: place names, seasonal subsistence, and why simple stereotypes fall short.

On this page
  1. Many peoples, many homelands
  2. Land as a place of memory
  3. How people made a living
  4. Avoiding the “ecological Indian” stereotype
  5. Knowledge passed between generations
  6. Pressure on land and what followed

Many peoples, many homelands

“The Apache” is not one people with one landscape. The Apache nations include the Western Apache (with groups such as the White Mountain and San Carlos Apache), the Chiricahua, the Mescalero, the Jicarilla, the Lipan, and the Plains Apache, sometimes called Kiowa Apache. Their homelands stretched across parts of what are now Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado and northern Mexico, and they included high forested mountains, desert basins, river valleys and southern Plains grassland.

Because the settings differed, so did daily life. A Western Apache family near the White Mountains and a Plains Apache family on the grasslands faced different seasons, plants, animals and neighbours. Any claim about “Apache” land use should be read as a general outline, with variation between groups and over time.

The timing of Apachean arrival in the Southwest is debated by scholars, who generally describe an Athabaskan-speaking migration from the north, while Apache oral traditions give their own accounts of origin. This article starts from the fact that, by the time Spanish records begin, Apache groups were deeply familiar with their regions.

Land as a place of memory

One of the clearest ways people express their relationship to land is through place names. Among the Western Apache, many place names are descriptive and are tied to stories about what happened there. The anthropologist Keith Basso, who worked with Western Apache people from the Cibecue area, documented how names and the stories attached to them are used to teach lessons about conduct and history. In that view a landscape is not only a resource but an archive, and a person can be reminded of a lesson simply by being told where something happened.

Some places are also important to ceremonial life. Mount Graham is significant to the San Carlos Apache, and Sierra Blanca is significant to the Mescalero. Oak Flat, in Arizona, is another place that Apache people describe as sacred, and debates over Oak Flat and Apache landscapes continue in public discussion today. Details of ceremonial knowledge are not shared publicly, and this site does not try to describe them. For ideas on how these places are discussed, see the wider topic of Apache sacred places.

How people made a living

Apache subsistence combined several activities, and the balance varied by group. Most relied on gathering wild plants and hunting game. Some, particularly the Western Apache and the Jicarilla, also planted crops in small fields. Groups with access to the plains, such as the Plains Apache and, at times, the Lipan, Jicarilla and Mescalero, hunted bison, and in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries horses changed travel and hunting for several Apache groups.

Common wild foods included agave hearts (often called mescal), acorns, piñon nuts, mesquite pods, juniper berries and cactus fruits, along with deer, rabbits and other game. Families usually moved through a yearly cycle, camping where particular foods were ready. This pattern is often described as an Apache seasonal round. The foods themselves are covered in more detail in the articles on Apache gathering foods, Apache hunting and Apache farming.

Dwellings, tools and clothing were made from local materials: wood and brush for wickiups, hide for tipis and clothing, stone for grinding and cutting, and plant fibres for baskets. Here too the variety matters, because the materials available in a mountain forest were not those of the open plains.

Avoiding the “ecological Indian” stereotype

Popular writing sometimes portrays Native peoples as perfect, unchanging conservationists. That image is well intentioned but inaccurate, because it turns real peoples into symbols. Apache families were practical and knowledgeable, and they made decisions about where to camp, what to harvest and when to move. Their knowledge of plants, animals, weather and water was detailed because their lives depended on it. That is different from a claim that every action was free of environmental effect, and historians generally avoid such sweeping statements about any society.

Some researchers have examined practices such as the deliberate use of fire in parts of the Southwest, and discussions of Apache forestry and fire management continue among scholars and land managers. Sources differ on how widespread or significant these practices were for particular groups, so it is safest to treat them as part of an ongoing conversation rather than a settled finding.

Knowledge passed between generations

Knowledge of land was learned by doing. Children accompanied relatives to gathering grounds and camps, and older family members pointed out plants, water sources, trails and the stories attached to places. This kind of teaching meant that a person’s understanding of a region grew over a lifetime and was tied to kin and community. It also means that much of it is held by people rather than in books, and some of it is not shared publicly. Today, language and cultural programmes in several nations work to keep place names and land knowledge in use, and the ideas behind Apache land stewardship are explained by the nations in their own words.

Pressure on land and what followed

From the Spanish and Mexican periods onward, and especially after the expansion of the United States into the Southwest, Apache groups faced settlers, miners, ranchers and military campaigns. Treaties, executive orders and the reservation system confined communities to areas much smaller than their earlier ranges, a history summarised in discussions of Apache land loss. Forced movements, including the imprisonment of Chiricahua people and the confinement of Mescalero and Navajo people at Bosque Redondo in the 1860s, separated people from the places they knew.

Today Apache nations are living governments with their own land bases, natural resource departments, ranching and forestry operations and cultural offices. Programmes and priorities change, so readers who want current information should consult the official websites of the nations themselves, such as the San Carlos Apache Tribe, the White Mountain Apache Tribe, the Mescalero Apache Tribe, the Jicarilla Apache Nation and others. This site is independent and does not speak for any nation.

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →