Common Myths and Corrections

Myth: Apache Life Was Only Raiding and War

Raiding was one part of some Apache groups' economies and politics. This article puts it alongside family life, farming, gathering, hunting and trade.

On this page
  1. The short version
  2. What raiding was, and was not
  3. Farming, gathering and hunting
  4. Family, home and community
  5. Trade and diplomacy
  6. Why the stereotype persists

The short version

Raiding was a real practice among several Apache groups, and it increased at times of pressure and conflict. But it was never the whole of anyone’s life. For most families most of the time, the work was getting enough food, caring for children and relatives, moving between seasonal camps, trading, and taking part in ceremonies. The idea that Apache existence consisted only of raiding and war comes from sources that recorded conflict because conflict was what interested them.

Because “Apache” covers several peoples, the details varied. Western Apache groups farmed along streams, Jicarilla and Plains Apache communities had close ties to Pueblo and Plains trade, and Chiricahua and Mescalero communities relied heavily on gathering and hunting in mountain and desert country. Any single description will not fit every group.

What raiding was, and was not

Raiding generally meant taking livestock, food or goods from another community, and sometimes captives. Historians of the Southwest describe raiding and trading as parts of one regional system that involved Pueblo, Spanish, Mexican, Comanche and other peoples as well as Apache groups. Horses and cattle moved through that system, and so did captives, who were taken and traded by many parties.

It also helps to distinguish raiding from war. Raiding for goods was usually a small-party activity with economic aims. Larger expeditions for revenge after a death had a different purpose and different rules. Colonial officials and later American writers often blurred the two and described every incident as war, which made the record look more violent than the underlying practices were.

Raiding did not come from nowhere, either. Settler expansion, the loss of hunting and farming land, the breakdown of trade and the failures of promised rations all contributed to periods when raiding rose. The Apache Wars are better understood as a long conflict with causes on several sides than as a result of an inborn Apache tendency.

Farming, gathering and hunting

Daily food came from a mix of sources, depending on the group and the place. Among some Western Apache communities, families planted corn, beans and squash in small fields along streams during the growing season, and then moved to gather wild foods. Apache farming was not a recent adoption in every case, and some groups practiced irrigation in suitable canyons, although sources differ on how widespread this was.

Gathering was essential and largely organized by women in many communities. Plants such as agave, acorns, pinon nuts, mesquite beans and cactus fruits were harvested in their seasons, and agave in particular was roasted for a sweet, storable food. The practice of mescal roasting gave the Mescalero Apache their name in Spanish. Hunting added deer and other game, and Apache hunting methods varied by landscape. This round of activity followed the year, so the idea of a seasonal round is more useful than the idea of a standing war camp.

Family, home and community

Underneath the economy was family. Many Apache societies, including the Western Apache, traced descent through the mother’s side, and households were often built around related women. Camps were typically groupings of extended families that came together and separated with the season and with need. Children learned skills by watching and helping, and older relatives had important roles in teaching.

This family structure shaped leadership too. Respected men and women gained influence through good judgment and generosity, and Apache social organization emphasized obligations to relatives. Descriptions that present Apache men solely as warriors leave out their roles as providers, fathers, brothers and uncles, and leave out women’s central roles in food, household and community.

Trade and diplomacy

Apache groups traded with their neighbors, exchanging items such as hides and meat for corn, cloth and pottery. Plains-oriented groups and Pueblo towns such as Taos, in northern New Mexico, are often described as having long trading relationships, though the relationship sometimes shifted between exchange and conflict. Later, trade with Spanish and Mexican settlements, and with American traders, added new goods and sometimes new tensions, and the Apache trade networks history of the region is a reminder that exchange was as old as the raiding.

Peace was also made. There were periods when Apache communities settled near Spanish presidios and drew rations under agreements, and later, some Apache people served as scouts for the U.S. Army. Treaties and negotiated settlements, imperfect and often broken, appear throughout the record.

Why the stereotype persists

Written sources emphasize raids because officials, soldiers and newspaper writers recorded incidents that harmed their interests. A year of ordinary harvesting generated no reports. Later, Westerns reused these accounts and left out the rest. Reading military reports and officer memoirs critically helps, because their authors usually described people from outside and with a purpose.

The more complete view is neither flattering nor condemning. Apache communities, like others, had conflict and had peace, had hardships and had daily comforts, and the full picture includes all of it.

The complete guide to common myths and corrections

Common Myths About Apache Peoples and the Facts Behind Them
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →