Oral Tradition

Apache Storytelling: Preserving the Tribe's Oral Tradition

Why the language of a story matters, and how Apache oral tradition and language revitalization in homes, schools and community programs support each other.

On this page
  1. Stories live in a language
  2. Why language loss affects stories
  3. Stories in language teaching
  4. Writing the stories down
  5. Language, story and identity

Stories live in a language

A story told in English is still a story, and many Apache people tell and hear stories in English today. Even so, tellers and linguists often point out that a narrative told in an Apache language can carry things that translation struggles to keep. The Apache languages belong to the Southern Athabaskan language family, and they build meaning with verb forms that fold together movement, shape, direction and manner in a way English does not. A single verb can pack in what an English sentence needs several words to say.

Several details matter for storytelling. Place-names in many Apache languages are descriptive, and they can recall an event or a feature in a few syllables. Humor and wordplay, including the sound-play in trickster tales, are tied to particular words. Apache dialects differ from one another, and speech styles also change depending on who is speaking to whom, which shapes how a story is told. When a story is translated, the information is often kept but some of this texture is lost, which is part of why translated collections can read as flat.

Why language loss affects stories

The Apache languages are spoken to different degrees by different nations, and the situation varies widely, from communities where children still learn the language at home to those where few or no fluent speakers remain. Federal boarding schools, along with other policies of forced assimilation, discouraged and sometimes punished the use of Native languages, and that history is one reason that the speaker numbers fell. Apache language speaker numbers also differ by source and change over time, so readers should consult the nations’ own sources for current information.

When fewer people speak a language, fewer people can hear stories as they were told. A young person who is raised in English may know the outline of a tale and still miss the wording that a grandparent would have used. Language and oral tradition are therefore tied together: stories are one of the main ways a language is passed on, and the language is one of the main ways stories are carried.

Stories in language teaching

Apache language programs, in schools, community centers and homes, often make use of stories because narrative offers something that word lists and drills do not. A story gives learners connected speech with a beginning, middle and end, and repetition makes it easier to remember. Children tend to enjoy hearing a tale again, which helps vocabulary and sentence patterns take hold.

Approaches described in programs generally include:

  • inviting fluent elders into classrooms, or recording them, so that learners hear natural speech;
  • using picture books and short texts in the language, often created locally;
  • immersion settings where a story is told and acted out entirely in the language;
  • home-based efforts in which families set aside regular times to tell stories in the language, however small their own knowledge.

Which approach is used, and whether it works, depends on the community. Programmes are run by the nations or by schools in partnership with them, and the names, funding and structures change over time. Readers who want to know what exists now should check the official websites of the nations concerned.

Writing the stories down

Apache languages have been written in several systems over roughly the last century, devised by missionaries, linguists and community members, and different nations and even different programs may use different spellings. Writing, which began with early Apache language documentation by missionaries and linguists, allows stories to be taught in classrooms and studied, but it also means choices about spelling and dialect, and it can fix one teller’s version as “the” version. Many community members prefer that written stories be treated as teaching aids, with the living teller still important.

Writing and recording are also not substitutes for the settings in which stories are told. A winter evening with relatives is different from a worksheet, and some stories are meant to be told only at certain times or by certain people. Language teachers and storytellers work to find a balance between wider access and respect for those customs.

Language, story and identity

For many speakers and learners, using the language for a story is a way of connecting with ancestors and with the land. Place-names recounted in Apache, and the stories attached to them, form a map that English labels on a modern chart do not replace. This is part of why language revival efforts are often described as being about more than communication.

Learners who come to the language later in life, or who are not fluent, also take part. Many communities welcome partial knowledge and encourage people to start where they are. Fluency is not the only way to take part in an oral tradition, since listening, remembering and passing along what one has been given are also forms of participation.

The complete guide to oral tradition

Apache Storytelling: The Oral Traditions of a People
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →