Origins and Belonging

Apache Tribe Origins: A Search for Identity and Belonging

How Apache nations set their own membership and enrollment rules, why those rules differ between nations, and why belonging is decided by each nation.

On this page
  1. Who decides
  2. Common building blocks
  3. Why the nations differ
  4. Recognition and the groups outside it
  5. Belonging beyond the roll
  6. Practical pointers

Who decides

In the United States, tribal nations have the authority to determine their own membership. That principle is widely recognized in federal law, and it means there is no national Apache rule and no single standard. Each nation decides for itself who is a citizen or enrolled member, usually through its constitution, bylaws or an enrollment ordinance. For this reason, a question such as “how much Apache ancestry do you need?” has no one answer. It depends on which nation is meant.

This article describes the general shape of those rules. It is not legal advice and it does not state current requirements for any nation. Those are set out in each nation’s own documents and can change, so anyone who needs specifics should consult the official website or enrollment office of the nation concerned.

Common building blocks

Though the details differ, enrollment rules among Native nations often draw on a few common elements:

  • Descent from a documented ancestor. Many nations require that an applicant be descended from a person listed on a historical roll or base roll, or from an enrolled member. Rolls were compiled at different times and for different purposes, and not everyone was recorded.
  • A minimum degree of tribal ancestry. Some nations use a minimum “blood quantum,” often written as a fraction. Others use lineal descent with no minimum fraction. Each system has supporters and critics inside communities, and some nations have debated or revised their rules.
  • Documents. Birth certificates, parents’ enrollment records and other papers are typically used to show the connection.
  • Other conditions. Some nations have additional requirements, such as rules about dual enrollment in more than one nation or about residency or community participation.

It is important to see that these rules express a political relationship between a person and a nation, not a genetic test. The article on Apache DNA ancestry tests covers why genetic results cannot establish this.

Why the nations differ

Apache nations came to their present forms through very different histories. The Western Apache groups were placed on reservations such as San Carlos and Fort Apache. The Mescalero Apache Reservation in New Mexico includes people from more than one Apache group. The Jicarilla Apache Nation has its own reservation in northern New Mexico. The Chiricahua were held as prisoners of war for 27 years, from 1886 to 1913, and afterward some chose to move to Mescalero while others remained in Oklahoma; the Fort Sill Apache Tribe is generally described as made up of descendants of that prisoner group. The Plains Apache are in southwestern Oklahoma. Because the nations were formed under different circumstances, their rolls and rules also differ.

Many tribal governments were organized under constitutions in the twentieth century, some following the Indian Reorganization Act, which encouraged tribes to adopt written governing documents. These documents often included membership provisions, and they have been amended since. The Apache tribal constitutions are discussed further elsewhere on this site.

Recognition and the groups outside it

Federal recognition adds another layer. Federally recognized Apache tribes have a government-to-government relationship with the United States. Some Apache descendants belong to communities that are not federally recognized, and their position is different: their members may be committed to Apache heritage and to each other, but they do not have the same legal standing. The situation of unrecognized Apache groups is a continuing topic, and views on it differ. For example, Lipan Apache descendants live in Texas and elsewhere, and a number of Lipan people are enrolled in the Mescalero Apache Tribe, so Lipan descendants are in a range of situations.

Belonging beyond the roll

Enrollment is a legal status, but belonging is broader. Within communities, people may be recognized through family, clan and neighborhood ties, through language and ceremony, and through participation in community life. Some people who are not enrolled are regarded by relatives as part of the family; some who are enrolled have little contact with their community. Loss of land, removal and boarding school separation left some families disconnected from rolls, and returning to a community can be complicated.

Because of this, individual questions deserve individual answers from the nation concerned, and outsiders should avoid guessing at someone’s status or demanding proof of it.

Practical pointers

  • Look to the nation’s own official website for membership information.
  • Be wary of third-party sites that claim to confirm Apache heritage.
  • Treat family stories of Apache ancestry as starting points for research in records, not as conclusions.
  • If an enrollment decision matters legally or financially, seek help from the nation’s enrollment office or a qualified professional.

The complete guide to origins and belonging

Apache Tribe Origins: A Search for Identity
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →