Spain and Mexico

Apache Apache Conflict with the Mexicans: A Study of the Tribe's Later Encounters

How Sonora and Chihuahua became a lasting arena of conflict and occasional peace for Chiricahua bands, from the Sierra Madre refuges to the 1880s campaigns.

On this page
  1. A borderland that outlasted the border
  2. Who was involved
  3. Why the Sierra Madre mattered
  4. Violence on both sides
  5. The 1880s
  6. What the record can and cannot say

A borderland that outlasted the border

The title above repeats a word, but the history it points to is real and specific: the northern Mexican states of Sonora and Chihuahua, together with parts of Coahuila, formed one of the longest-running arenas of conflict and contact involving Chiricahua Apache bands. The pattern of Sonora and Chihuahua raids and counter-campaigns began under Spain and continued through the Mexican period into the 1880s. By then the border between Mexico and the United States was a more important line to governments than to the people who crossed it.

This article concentrates on the geography and the people involved, and on the final phase of the conflict. The collapse of the ration system after 1821 and the policy of bounties are covered in the separate article on Mexican policy, and only summarised here.

Who was involved

“Chiricahua” is a collective name for several related bands, and sources use different spellings and divisions. Four are most often named: the Chokonen, the Chihenne (also called Warm Springs or Mimbres), the Bedonkohe and the Nednhi. Their homelands lay mainly in what is now southern New Mexico, southeastern Arizona and the borderlands of northern Mexico, and the Nednhi in particular are associated with the Sierra Madre. The Chihenne Apache and the Nednhi Apache lived in different regions and had different histories with Mexican towns, so generalising about “the Chiricahua” can mislead.

Mexican communities were just as varied. Towns such as Janos in Chihuahua and settlements along the Sonoran frontier had histories of both trade and bitter loss with Apache neighbours. Ranches, mines and small villages bore the cost of raiding, while state governments argued with each other and with the national capital over who should pay for defence.

Why the Sierra Madre mattered

The rugged Sierra Madre Occidental gave Apache families remote, defensible places to camp, gather food and rest. Mexican and, later, American troops found it very difficult to operate there. Bands that came under pressure north of the line, especially in the 1870s and 1880s as the U.S. Army pressed Chiricahua people onto reservations, often retreated south. This made northern Mexico both a refuge and a place of renewed conflict.

Raiding for livestock was one part of a mixed economy that included hunting, gathering and, at times, trade. Some Apache groups traded stolen or acquired livestock in towns on either side of the border, and some Mexican merchants and officials took part in that trade. Occasional truces, sometimes arranged at places like Janos, allowed rations and commerce for a time before breaking down, usually after an attack on one side or the other. The record shows peace as a genuine, repeated option, not just a pause.

Violence on both sides

Both sides suffered losses of life, and the lasting memory of those losses shaped later attitudes. Geronimo, a Bedonkohe man, later described losing his mother, wife and children in an attack by Mexican troops in 1851, an event often associated with Janos; his account is a later recollection and some details are uncertain, but it explains why many Chiricahua leaders carried deep grievances against Mexican forces. Mangas Coloradas, a leading Chihenne figure, similarly had reasons of his own for mistrust. Mexican families, in turn, recalled raids on ranches and travellers. Bounties on Apache people in Chihuahua and Sonora, which encouraged hunters to kill and collect scalps, deepened the cycle and killed people who had not taken part in any raid.

The 1880s

Victorio, a Chihenne leader, led a band that left the reservation system in the late 1870s and fought both U.S. and Mexican forces. In October 1880 Mexican troops from Chihuahua, commanded by Joaquín Terrazas, attacked his group at Tres Castillos. Victorio was killed, and dozens of his followers were killed or taken prisoner. Sources differ on the exact figures, and the captives were taken away from their families.

Juh, associated with the Nednhi, died in the early 1880s, and other leaders such as Geronimo and Naiche continued to move between reservations in Arizona and refuges in Mexico. In 1882 the United States and Mexico reached an arrangement allowing each country’s troops to cross the border when in pursuit of Apache groups under certain conditions. This helped bring about the campaigns of 1883 and 1886, with the surrender of Geronimo’s band in 1886 usually seen as the end of the Apache Wars in the Southwest. What followed for the Chiricahua was long imprisonment, a story that belongs under the Chiricahua prisoners of war period.

What the record can and cannot say

Most surviving accounts come from Mexican state archives, U.S. Army reports and later memoirs, so Apache motives are often described through the eyes of opponents. Cautious readers will want to compare sources and notice when a report speaks of “the Apache” without naming a group. Chiricahua descendants today live in communities such as the Fort Sill Apache Tribe and among the Mescalero Apache, and those nations’ own histories are the best guide to how this era is remembered.

The complete guide to spain and mexico

The Apache and the Spanish: A Turbulent Relationship
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →